Thursday, 21 May 2015

Recruitment: trainee solicitor vacancy at Govan Law Centre

Govan Law Centre is seeking a new Trainee Solicitor to join its award winning legal team.  

The role will include defending evictions and mortgage repossessions as part of our Prevention of Homelessness Rights Hubs across Glasgow, providing advice and representation on a range of social welfare law, consumer rights and public law issues, along with undertaking work in our Govanhill Law Centre office, working with the Roma community and EU migrant workers.

The new post will also have scope to undertake legal work within our national Education Law Unit, which provides expert advice and representation in the field of Scots education law. There may also be an opportunity to undertake Parliamentary law reform and social justice campaign work. We believe this is a fantastic opportunity for someone who has a demonstrable passion for social justice in Scotland.

Please send a CV, and a relevant covering letter (the covering letter should be no more than 2 pages of A4) to: Mike Dailly, Principal Solicitor at Govan Law Centre, 18-20 Orkney Street, Glasgow, G51 2BZ or m@govanlc.com. The closing date for applications is 4pm, Friday 12 June 2015.

No recruitment agencies necessary thank-you.  The likely interview date for shortlisted candidates is the week commencing Monday 22 June 2015.

Govan Law Centre is a Registered Scottish Charity SC030193 http://www.govanlc.com/ And aims to be an Equal Opportunities Employer. You must hold, or be entitled to hold, a valid Entrance Certificate from the Law Society of Scotland to apply for this post, in relation to a proposed start date of Summer 2015.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Thursday, 7 May 2015

Sheriff Principal upholds Ayrshire homeowner's appeal against mortgage repossession

The Sheriff Principal of North Strathclyde has allowed a homeowner's appeal against a decree for mortgage repossession at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court today.

In the case of Clydesdale Bank plc v. S, an order for ejection and possession had been granted earlier this year as the homeowner's mortgage had matured and come to an end. The homeowner had become ill, with a drop in household income, and the bank was unwilling to provide any further lending.

All possible avenues for a solution had been pursued unsuccessfully, however, the Ayrshire Homelessness and Prevention (AHAP) project solicitor, Lynn Fraser of Govan Law Centre (GLC) had pursued a mortgage mis-selling case against Clydesdale Bank plc.

This was on the basis that the bank had sold their customer an interest only 'mortgage' that lasted for three and half years. The customer had purchased a property upon the understanding that a mortgage had been provided on the standard repayment basis, with an initial short term period of three and half years being 'interest only'. In fact, the product actually sold was a short term secured loan, and not a mortgage in the normal understanding of that term.

When the case called before the sheriff, the Clydesdale Bank plc advised the court that the mis-selling complaint had been 'rejected', notwithstanding this had not been intimated to the customer in writing. The sheriff considered that there was no defence, although the homeowner's solicitor advised the mis-selling case was live, and access to the Financial Ombudsman Service's statutory alternative dispute redress scheme might well be pursued given the unusual nature of the mortgage product sold.

In recalling the sheriff's interlocutor (decree for repossession), Sheriff Principal Murray held that the sheriff had erred in law in his application of the statutory tests in section 24(7) of the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970, and the identical provisions in section 5A(7) of the Heritable Securities (Scotland) Act 1894. He considered that the mis-selling case was a relevant matter which should have been explored further and that a proof should have been fixed.

The Sheriff Principal allowed answers (defences) to be lodged by the appellant and defender, and fixed an evidential hearing (diet of proof). The appellant and defender was represented by GLC's Mike Dailly; and the respondents and pursuers by McClure Naismith LLP's David Forrester.

The decisions of Sheriff Principals are binding in their Sheriffdoms. The Sheriffdom of North Strathclyde includes the Sheriff Courts of Kilmarnock, Dunoon, Oban, Campbeltown, Greenock, Dumbarton and Paisley.  Scotland has six Sheriffdoms.



Share/Save/Bookmark

Wednesday, 29 April 2015

Call for greater consumer protection initiatives to prevent misconduct in European banking

GLC's Principal Solicitor has called upon the European Banking Authority (EBA) to make greater use of its Article 9 consumer protection mandate to help prevent misconduct in banking across the European Union (EU).

In a presentation to the Board of Supervisors of EBA in London yesterday, Mike Dailly noted that EBA had and was undertaking good measures in relation to inappropriate sales incentives and financial stability, however, business misconduct had now become a systemic, macro-prudential risk.

The cost of misconduct from the world’s top 10 banks was £150bn (2008-12) including fines for mis-selling, LIBOR and EURIBOR manipulation, breach of money laundering rules, and non-regulatory compliance. Mis-selling through inappropriate sales incentives schemes was at the heart of the problem and was an ongoing issue.

For example UK mis-sold payment protection insurance compensation payments were over £28bn and rising; in Spain compensation for mis-sold hybrid securities was at 2.9bn; in the Netherlands compensation for customers of the failed DSB Bank totalled 215m; the cost of the bail out of Banco Espirito Santo  in Portugal was 2.1bn; while Deutsche Bank AG was fined £227m last week by the UK's FCA for LIBOR and EURIBOR manipulation and repeatedly misleading the regulator's investigation.

GLC's Mike Dailly suggested a range of initiatives including greater legal accountability of banking executives; a binding ethical code of practice as part of a drive towards professionalism; more meaningful and targeted disclosure to empower consumers and minimise financial detriment; EU market studies on access, quality and pricing of personal current accounts, and analysis of cross-border barriers to banking; all backed up with appropriate legal guidelines and recommendations under Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No. 1093/2010.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Wednesday, 8 April 2015

GLC's Mike Dailly appointed to the Board of the UK's Money Advice Service

The Financial Conduct Authority has appointed Govan Law Centre's Mike Dailly as a non-executive director of the Money Advice Service's Board, along with two other new non-executive directors, Caroline Fawcett and Nicola Bruce. All three appointments commence on 1 April.

Andy Briscoe, Chair of the Money Advice Service said: “I am delighted to welcome our new non-executive directors onto the Board. Between them they bring extensive experience of financial services and also considerable knowledge of the debt advice sector. They will bring valuable insight to the Money Advice Service and their joining us strengthens the Board as recommended by the Farnish review.”

"Raising the financial capability of the UK population is at the heart of everything we do at the Money Advice Service. Our 2015/16 business plan reflects our focus on helping consumers to plan ahead for key life events such as buying a home, having a baby or for retirement".

"Debt advice is also a key priority, encouraging more people to seek advice and continuing to raise standards across the sector. Our new board members are well placed to guide and support our talented executive team in taking forward this challenging but vital agenda.”

The Money Advice Service is an independent organisation. Set up by government to help people make the most of their money, it gives free, unbiased money advice across the UK – online, over the phone and face to face. Paid for by a statutory levy on the financial services industry, raised through the Financial Conduct Authority, its statutory objectives are to enhance the understanding & knowledge of members of the public about financial matters (including the UK financial system), and to enhance the ability of the public to manage their own financial affairs.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Sunday, 29 March 2015

Govan Law Centre endorses Living Rent campaign and calls for real rights for Scotland's private rented sector tenants

Govan Law Centre's Board of Trustees have agreed to endorse and support the Living Rent campaign in Scotland.

The campaign seeks proper fair rent controls in Scotland's private rented sector (PRS), as well as security of tenure for tenants in that sector.

Govan Law Centre (GLC) is deeply concerned that the greatest rise in 'severe' and 'extreme poverty' in Scotland is amongst PRS tenants.  While the latest annual figures show that severe poverty in other housing tenures have fallen in Scotland, the number in poverty in the PRS rose by 140,000.

Housing costs now amount on average to 24 per cent of the income of private renters - compared with 20 per cent a decade ago - and in comparison to 18 per cent of social renters’ income and 11 per cent for owner-occupiers with a mortgage.

GLC's Principal Solicitor, Mike Dailly, set out our calls for  progressive law reform and regulatory change in Scotland at the launch of the Glasgow Living Rent campaign at the CCA in Glasgow on Saturday 28 March 2015.  Mike's speech is available (as a PDF) here

Private sector tenants need meaningful legal rights. The current landlord registration schemes needs revamped and strengthened. We need to remove the bad landlords and letting agencies from the register. 

We need a national strategy and co-ordination of enforcement. Proactive enforcement with legal teeth. 

GLC believes we need a Scotland-wide PRS inspectorate with full regulatory powers to set a proper standard of good practice, with the power to prosecute landlords and letting agencies across the country. 

We need a robust statutory mechanism to set rents at a fair and reasonable level. A mechanism that is practical and works for tenants. And most importantly, we need genuine security of tenure for PRS tenants.
Share/Save/Bookmark